> On 7 May 2017, at 11:32, Curtis Maloney <cur...@tinbrain.net> wrote: > > Dogfooding is a fairly strong argument, IMHO. > > Especially when there's a volunteer to do the work. > > -- > C
I agree. I was mildly concerned about the effect on relevance, but the current search isn't all that good. A quick test shows that it doesn't handle normalization: https://docs.djangoproject.com/fr/1.11/search/?q=mod%C3%A8le <https://docs.djangoproject.com/fr/1.11/search/?q=mod%C3%A8le> https://docs.djangoproject.com/fr/1.11/search/?q=modele <https://docs.djangoproject.com/fr/1.11/search/?q=modele> or stemming: https://docs.djangoproject.com/fr/1.11/search/?q=documentation <https://docs.djangoproject.com/fr/1.11/search/?q=documentation> https://docs.djangoproject.com/fr/1.11/search/?q=documentations <https://docs.djangoproject.com/fr/1.11/search/?q=documentations> or stopwords: https://docs.djangoproject.com/fr/1.11/search/?q=de <https://docs.djangoproject.com/fr/1.11/search/?q=de> These features are desirable and easy to configure with ES <https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/analysis-lang-analyzer.html>, but that wasn't done, perhaps for lack of familiarity with ES. Apparently they're also doable with Postgres FTS. If we can remove ES from the stack and improve relavance, that would be great. -- Aymeric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/E4FB21CE-DBF6-4D89-B8DC-0A27E7E82D15%40polytechnique.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
