I like that idea - keep it a private API for now and make it a public API once people have used it a little bit.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Shai Berger <s...@platonix.com> wrote: > On Friday 18 August 2017 09:08:11 Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > > Maybe we should just add the queryset method. This is the smallest atomic > > task that can be done. Even if there's only the queryset method > available, > > it's possible to enable prefetches per model by using a Manager. > > > I disagree on both counts: I don't think it's the smallest atomic task, and > I'm not so sure it's the right thing to do. > > The smallest atomic task, the way I see it, is building the infrastructure > that would allow adding the queryset method -- but would also allow > different > APIs to be set around it. > > And since there is as yet no consensus on the correct API for "end" users, > I > would rather not define one immediately. > > Shai. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAFO84S4hduThLVTwN-Y0uqVy48aRRndvMgzmGOb24zTD9g0wmQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.