Just bringing this up for the sake of thoroughness: NOTE: This is a beta product *Black* is already successfully used by several projects, small and big. It also sports a decent test suite. However, it is still very new. Things will probably be wonky for a while. This is made explicit by the "Beta" trove classifier, as well as by the "b" in the version number. What this means for you is that until the formatter becomes stable, you should expect some formatting to change in the future. That being said, no drastic stylistic changes are planned, mostly responses to bug reports.
Many/most of us use it in production settings already, as the AST check guarantees it isn't going to break anything, but the beta status means you can't always do a simple `pip install black`, and it means that black's formatting choices could change. Does a project as significant as Django want to adopt a beta tool whose "contract" with its users has not yet stabilized? I heart black and would be happy to see it in Django but wonder if we should wait a bit to hit 1.0. ./s -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/5d71f95a-1a8a-4db4-a2ac-8a59adde1fb5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
