#24104: SQLite schema should to look for internal type of field instead of class
instance when choosing a default for created fields
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  coldmind             |                    Owner:  coldmind
         Type:                       |                   Status:  new
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  1.7
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Release blocker      |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  1
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by claudep:

Old description:

> See alex/django-taggit#285 for example where this issue can be present.
> Some custom related fields can not have a default, but in the same time
> they will be not inheritors of ManyToManyField.

New description:

 See [[https://github.com/alex/django-taggit/issues/285|alex/django-
 taggit#285]] for example where this issue can be present.
 Some custom related fields can not have a default, but in the same time
 they will be not inheritors of ManyToManyField.

--

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24104#comment:3>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/066.de5cf8e5da1079eaf0ab615e4c82de25%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to