#26430: Coalesce in Aggregations ignored when EmptyResultSet returned -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: ryanprater | Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Database layer | Version: 1.9 (models, ORM) | Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: aggregation | Triage Stage: coalesce in queryset | Unreviewed Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0 Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0 Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ryanprater): I can agree that detecting specific expressions is overkill and for that matter, not scalable. However, I don't think an "empty list in a filter clause seems like broken behavior". As you mentioned about valid use cases: I'm using this with a SelectMultiple which obviously allows users to select no options. Writing custom validation to prevent an empty query should be the responsibility of the developer, but not enforced at the framework level. It seems like this could be avoided by modifying the logic of `In.rhs` (and/or not throwing the `EmptyResultSet` at all?), but this is my first bug and I'm not versed enough to discern. -- Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26430#comment:2> Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/068.8ce1916cfaed5eed168e02c60c048e2a%40djangoproject.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.