#34658: New assertion `assertNotInHTML`, like `assertContains` has
`assertNotContains`
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Thibaud Colas | Owner: nobody
Type: New feature | Status: closed
Component: Testing framework | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution: wontfix
Keywords: testcases, unit | Triage Stage:
tests, HTML, assertions, testing | Unreviewed
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Mariusz Felisiak):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
I'm skeptic. Personally, I find the use of `*NotIn*` assertions really
rare and not the best practice. There can many many reasons why something
is not in something else, and it becomes even more unreliable when we do
this in HTML. It's much more stable and bulletproof to use `*In*`
assertions. I don't think it's worth adding.
Please first start a discussion on the DevelopersMailingList, where you'll
reach a wider audience and see what other think, and
[https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/stable/internals/contributing/bugs-and-
features/#requesting-features follow the guidelines with regards to
requesting features].
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34658#comment:2>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/01070188c516f9f8-a8cfcd97-ede1-416b-9e91-5abc70366d52-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
