#9739: Admin does not correctly prefill DataTimeField from URL
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: gilhad | Owner: Fabian Binz
Type: Bug | Status: assigned
Component: contrib.admin | Version: 1.0
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 1
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by Fabian Binz):
I've looked at this ticket for quite some time during and after the recent
sprint at the Cologne Django Meetup.
For now, I've come to the conclusion, that - while there are definitely
ways to build the functionality that's requested in the ticket - it's
actually quite hard to do that in a manner that's general enough to cover
all cases.
What follows is a lengthy discussion of my current understanding of the
problem, partly to just have a record of this for myself, but maybe we
could also discuss a way forward:
1. Handling of initial data for multi-value fields
2. Parsing of localized datetime strings
3. Deviation from the way HTML forms normally work
The source of the "bug" is actually pretty simple: The
SplitDateTimeWidget.decompress method expects its input to be a datetime
object, which is not the case when the initial data is passed via a query
parameter. According to the docs, this is a reasonable behavior, since the
decompress method actually should only receive valid inputs (i.e. a
datetime object). So, I guess it's not unreasonable to crash if passed a
plain string.
So, why is this contract violated in this case? Because the initial data
specified via query parameters is passed verbatim - via a bunch of
indirections - to the widget's decompress method, without any form of
validation or parsing.
Now, how could we actually parse or validate the input properly? In the
case of a datetime field, I think we'd either have to settle on some
standard way of formatting datetimes (datetime.isofromat seems reasonable
as opposed to a comma- or space-separated representation discussed above)
or we could take into account the DATETIME_FORMAT setting that the user
has set. However, this doesn't really seem feasible.
Fundamentally, I think the issue is that POST and GET data are not handled
in a similar manner for MultiValueFields/MultiWidgets:
Let's say we have a datetime field named "created_at". The
SplitDateTimeWidget would render HTML similar to the following:
<input name="created_at_0" ...>
<input name="created_at_1" ...>
Normally, we'd use query parameters like "created_at_0=2024-01-02" and
"created_at_1=15:31:23" to pre-fill both the date and the time. For multi-
value fields however, we expect that we can set both values using a single
query parameter.
When data is POSTed, we don't have that problem, since both inputs are
simply separate values and can easily be passed to the
MultiValueField.compress method.
For my taste, having this difference between POST and GET does not make
much sense and it would seem more consistent to just use the individual
input names to pre-fill fields. This also enables partially pre-filling
inputs, which is much harder when expecting to have a single
representation of a value.
But I also see the convenience of having a single URL parameter to set
multiple fields. There are even test cases which kind-of test this
behavior (though not for the SplitDateTimeWidget). So maybe an alternative
would be to make the serialization/deserialization to/from string a part
of the interface of the MultiValueField/MutliWidget classes, so that those
methods can be used where needed.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9739#comment:29>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018d3dcd1e44-b675a0b9-702d-430a-8d88-ec9e80e14ce2-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
