#35147: Document that non-wrapped arithmetic with integer fields might require
explicit output_field
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Petar Netev | Owner: nobody
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: Documentation | Version: 5.0
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: annotate, bitand, | Triage Stage: Accepted
filter, integerfield, overflow |
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Tim Graham):
Replying to [comment:6 Petar Netev]:
> Hi Natalia and Simon,
>
> I would like to prepare the patch, but I would need some clarifications
on it.
>
> - Do we reference the release notes for version 5.0, specifically
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/releases/5.0/#models ?
> - Do we reference the documentation of the F()
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/releases/5.0/#models ?
>
> Simon, can you share the commit related to "I'm fairly certain this
relates to a commit meant to address a SQLite crash and a DDOS vector on
Postgres only present in 5.0" in order to mention it in the docs
improvements?
>
> Thank you both!
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35147#comment:8>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018d5830df33-0c9bfe3b-3613-4bc7-86c2-4208fc8c3993-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
