#35147: Document that non-wrapped arithmetic with integer fields might require
explicit output_field
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Petar Netev | Owner: nobody
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: Documentation | Version: 5.0
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: annotate, bitand, | Triage Stage: Accepted
filter, integerfield, overflow |
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Tim Graham):
Replying to [comment:6 Petar Netev]:
> Hi Natalia and Simon,
>
> I would like to prepare the patch, but I would need some clarifications
on it.
>
> - Do we reference the release notes for version 5.0, specifically
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/releases/5.0/#models ?
> - Do we reference the documentation of the F()
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/releases/5.0/#models ?
>
> Simon, can you share the commit related to "I'm fairly certain this
relates to a commit meant to address a SQLite crash and a DDOS vector on
Postgres only present in 5.0" in order to mention it in the docs
improvements?
>
> Thank you both!
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35147#comment:8>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018d5830df33-0c9bfe3b-3613-4bc7-86c2-4208fc8c3993-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
