#35147: Document that non-wrapped arithmetic with integer fields might require
explicit output_field
     Reporter:  Petar Netev          |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:                       |                   Status:  new
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  Documentation        |                  Version:  5.0
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:  annotate, bitand,    |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
  filter, integerfield, overflow     |
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
Comment (by Tim Graham):

 Replying to [comment:6 Petar Netev]:
 > Hi Natalia and Simon,
 > I would like to prepare the patch, but I would need some clarifications
 on it.
 > - Do we reference the release notes for version 5.0, specifically
 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/releases/5.0/#models ?
 > - Do we reference the documentation of the F()
 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/releases/5.0/#models ?
 > Simon, can you share the commit related to "I'm fairly certain this
 relates to a commit meant to address a SQLite crash and a DDOS vector on
 Postgres only present in 5.0" in order to mention it in the docs
 > Thank you both!
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35147#comment:8>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to