#36766: Reference to package as "module" is confusing
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: Bob Kline | Owner: Bob Kline
Type: Bug | Status: closed
Component: Documentation | Version: 5.2
Severity: Normal | Resolution: wontfix
Keywords: models | Triage Stage: Unreviewed
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 1 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Changes (by Jacob Walls):
* resolution: => wontfix
* status: assigned => closed
Comment:
Hi Bob, thanks for the ticket. I saw this on forum and was going to reply.
I don't think we want to describe the models module as a package, as it's
not intended to be distributed by itself.
That sense of "package" as "packaged for distribution" is clarified here:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.2/intro/reusable-apps/#reusability-
matters
Given that startapp doesn't create any package metadata I'm wary of
adopting that "package" wording in additional places. In other words,
neither the models module nor the app needs to be a package.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/36766#comment:5>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107019adfc33e88-1e91181c-c232-49d1-8a8b-e707fd1a7c3c-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
