#12990: New Field Type: JSONField
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: paltman | Owner: nobody
Status: new | Milestone:
Component: Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: 1.2-beta
Resolution: | Keywords:
Stage: Design decision needed | Has_patch: 1
Needs_docs: 0 | Needs_tests: 0
Needs_better_patch: 0 |
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by floguy):
Most of the time the problems are with dumpdata/loaddata. Anyway, the
sheer proliferation of implementations of this should make it clear why a
canonical implementation should be in core.
* http://www.davidcramer.net/code/448/cleaning-up-with-json-and-sql.html
* http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/377/
* http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/1478/
*
http://github.com/djblets/djblets/blob/master/djblets/util/fields.py#L136
* http://github.com/django-extensions/django-
extensions/blob/master/django_extensions/db/fields/json.py
* http://github.com/bradjasper/django-jsonfield
* http://bitbucket.org/offline/django-
annoying/src/tip/annoying/fields.py#cl-34
* http://bitbucket.org/lorien/django-
common/src/0896d0968ea5/common/fields.py#cl-29
--
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12990#comment:6>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.
