On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thinking 'but we can make our own Q&A site' is foolish. See Jeff > Attwood's post on the same subject: > I wouldnt do this and am in no way going to be doing this. Instead, i am suggesting an ArticleBase. <http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2009/07/code-its-trivial.html> > OP: > Noble aims. How do you aim to achieve 'highly curated' articles and > snippets? > One of the principle problems with djangosnippets is that the snippets > often tend to work only at the version of django the user developed > them at. > Do you intend to revalidate every article and snippet on every django > release? > How will you do that, will each snippet/article be required to have > testcases? > Who will write the testcases? > Will you validate against latest current release, or a variety of releases? > All the release information and etc etc will be mentioned clearly. What is supported and what not. I will try to write up a sample article on this and share to give you a flavour of what i have in mind. Who will write? Good q - anyone. But for it to appear in the article base, it has to be approved - the article should contain all the relevant information. Think in terms of wikibase for django tips/tricks/articles. ONE place. Though, I would still like this to be part of the djangoproject article storehouse than we hosting this independently. -V -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
