Am Mittwoch, den 19.10.2011, 07:54 +0530 schrieb kenneth gonsalves: > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:47 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > > > 1.3 belongs to the stone age - since you are learning, it would be a > > > > > good idea to work with the current svn trunk, updating every week or > > > > > so. > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > s/1.2/1.3/ > > > > > With all due respect to Mr. Gonsalves, I do not care to work with the > > > Django trunk unless I'm just playing around with something. My goal > > > is always to produce a production quality application. Even the more > > > stable than average Django trunk cannot provide the consistency needed > > > to deliver an app to a customer. Plus, I don't need the extra work of > > > basing my code on a moving target. When trunk becomes v1.4, I will > > > convert my applications and upgrade. > > > > Please read the message you are referring to again. Kenneth corrected > > the post [2] (although the `sed`-command should be `s/1.3/1.2/`. »The > > latest official version is 1.3.1.« [1], so Kenneth suggested to use > > the current stable release. > > not right - I meant to say that 1.2 belongs to the stone age.
I thought that is what I wrote. Maybe I need to improve my English.
> I think the sed command is correct.
The to be replaced term goes first.
$ echo "1.3" | sed s/1.2/1.3/
1.3
$ echo "1.2" | sed s/1.2/1.3/
1.3
I hope I did not misunderstood something this time.
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
