On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:23:15PM -0400, Mike Schinkel wrote: > > Malcolm Tredinnick wrote; > > > > Outlook has had rule-based sorting into other mailboxes for a while, > > > > so I would have thought it was possible to use that. > > > > > > It does have that. And I tried that for a while, but found it to be > > > "out-of-sight, out-of-mind." It's worse than just going to the group page > > > and searching when I need something. > > > > So rather than you changing your usage patterns slightly, you > > want us to change the list appearance for over 5000 other people. > > 1.) How many people will be negatively affected? Would there really be > anybody? > 2.) Did you not read that I've tried to changing your usage patterns > slightly, and nothing works?
File a bug against Outlook with MSFT, or use a different client. That is the only reasonable solution. It certainly doesn't seem reasonable to me to enforce constraints against senders simply because your client is not as powerful as many others (which have had the necessary features for *years*). -Forest
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
