Stefan Matthias Aust escribió: > Chris, > > 2007/7/19, Chris Hoeppner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> There would still be the problem of people wanting to >> "one-click-install" plugins and themes. But why would such a person even >> think about using a framework instead of wordpress? > > My point was that - assuming the Django community wants to spread the > word that Django is the best answer to whatever question - that you > have to target people who just want to use an application and > demonstrate the greatness. This requires a momentum, a community. > > If you just not want to bother those people and do not want to be > bothered, then, well, let them use Wordpress :) > > All I tried to say is perhaps that people who are looking for a simple > to use blogging solution might want to get there with the least amount > of work. Installing Wordpress is damn easy. Everybody with "computer > knowledge" therefore typically recommends Wordpress (let's not dive > into the discussion here that PHP is nearly always preinstalled and > Python not). > > Would you recommend your non-technical friends to go and install > Python and Django, then to compile a common repository of stuff > grabbed from all over the web and then to write their own custom > blogging solution because it's so easy? I guess not :) >
Depends. If they're non-technical but willing to learn, yes. And I'd assist them. If they're just stupid and want it to "just plain work" then I'd tell them to go and buy a book about "windows for dummies". And I don't mean that I *would*, but more that I *have done many times*. Some of them come back after a while, knowing a bit more, and wanting to learn. Others just don't bother me ever again. I like both of them :-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
