Thanks for the reply, Wiiboy. I agree that web2py is cool and Massimo is a good guy.
I'm still comparing the two frameworks and don't have a lot of preferences to list yet, but so far I prefer the way the online Django tutorial is written to the Overview/tutorial chapter of the web2py book. I also don't like all the unnecessary fluff that comes with web2py which I think is geared toward teaching students who don't know how to use VIM or a shell - like the weak text-editor, or the useless on-line designer. I would be interested to hear if anybody else has gotten far enough with web2py to discover any other idiosyncracies that made them go back to Django. On Feb 18, 7:26 am, Wiiboy <[email protected]> wrote: > First of all, I'd like to say that I think Web2py, and its maintainer > Massimo, are awesome. =) > > I tried Web2py for a little while a couple months ago, but the biggest > issue was poor documentation -- at the time, there was almost > nothing. Now there's a whole book, online, but... > > Also, it was missing a few basic features Django had (session-by- > session expiration for auto-logout, etc.), although I'm sure if I'd > mentioned them to Massimo, he probably would've implemented them > pretty quick. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
