I've noticed that there have been a lot of things in common:
Web2py _didn't_ have very good docs, at least relative to Django's
(which are spectacular), but now that the Web2py book is available
online, that issue is kind of moot.

Admin -- Web2py has two different Admins, one which doesn't have a
Django equivalent (lets you manage apps, etc. from it, pretty handy)
and a not-as-good-as-Django's-Admin appadmin.  Although it certainly
could do the job for my tiny site =)

And the explicit vs. implicit imports: Personally, I love the fact
that the request object is available all over the place, including
models, and that I don't have to do any importing.

My final complaint about Web2py is its templating engine: if I want my
Dad to do the HTML on my website, I'd rather not make him learn
"Python", per se, rather, I'd like him to learn a slightly different
but less strict of a syntax templating engine.

Ok, I'm done.  Feel free to comment on anything above (including you
Massimo =)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to