Adam Gibson --> dkim-milter-discuss (2007-08-16 23:50:31 -0400): > Thanks for the info. That sure saves some time if I want to go that > route but regardless I will also use rsa-sha1 to be compatible with more > systems.
...and if everybody signs using rsa-sha1 for compatibility reasons nobody will ever be forced to support rsa-sha256 at all... ;-) > What I was really trying to get at though is that if distributions > decide to add this today and make it easier for people to install (RPM, > etc) then they will end up using the openssl that is included by > default. Distributions shipping with OpenSSL <0.9.8 and providing a dkim-milter package should probably provide the latter statically linked with OpenSSL 0.9.8 libraries. Regards, Jukka -- bashian roulette: $ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
