Hi Murray, Does DKIM-Milter has a problem with a control-m embeded in the message bodies?
I found if mail has a control-m characters at the beginning or at the end of the message bodies, the message failed to verified, if I removed the control-m it verifies fine. For example, the below will fail for me: ^MTake a look at: http://www.monster.com/JobDesc.asp?id=3492045&jmid=3824^M Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks, Janet On 9/7/07, Murray S. Kucherawy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > When you add "Priority: normal" with OmitHeaders working (as you've > > shown it is), the Priority header field is not included in the > > signature. That means whether or not the header is added later, the > > verifier will ignore it. > > > > If your signature is failing to verify then, something else is wrong. > > To test, I added a "Priority: normal" header to a message to all of the > autoresponders I know about, and all of them passed my signature. I > tested this with and without OmitHeaders. > > The problem is very likely something else. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > dkim-milter-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
