At 02:35 11-10-2007, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >I was going over some details, and because DKIM has been in such a state >of flux over the past year, I need to ask: > >1) Does DKIM no longer have an o= policy flag? I saw nothing about o= >when searching the RFC, but it could just be because DKIM is an >"extension" to DomainKeys, and that's a DomainKeys thing.
That would be the outbound signing practice. See the SSP draft. It's "dkim=" instead of "o=". >2) Is the _policy record now ignored, again? The _ssp record is used to publish the sender signing practice. >Is there a basic "cheat sheet" of "here's the flags you need for >DomainKeys, here's the ones you need for DKIM somewhere that's known to be >up-to-date with the RFC's (suffice it to say, there's a LOT of what I >presume to be stale info about. I don't think so. Regards, -sm ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
