Dave Isaacs skrev, on 24-10-2007 15:11: > The target system for my dkim-filter installation is a Red Hat EL4 > system, which includes openssl 0.9.7. > > Since I want support for SHA256, I will have to use openssl 0.9.8 or > better. I see two options > > (1) Install the latest openssl on the system, in a location separate > from the existing openssl installation, and compile dkim-filter in such > a way that it points to the 0.9.8 installation. > > (2) Link dkim-filter statically with openssl 0.9.8, so that I don't have > to install another instance of openssl on the target system. > > I'd rather not do (1), for reasons of convenience which I will not go > into right now. > > That leaves me with option (2). Is it possible to statically link with > openssl? How would I do this?
There's one more option, that I've done with all my rigs - since RHEL4 is definitely yesterday's: 3: upgrade/reinstall RHEL5/CentOS5/Fedora FC >= FC6. Really, RHAS4 is, of date, definitely passé. Much good stuff just doesn't work on it any longer - or if it does, simply by botching source to /usr/local, you name it. People making *structural* changes, such as installing upgrades of (openssl|Cyrus SASL|Oracle BDB|more stuff) without doing it by using good rpms are simply heaping coals upon their heads. Yes, I've many years experience, it was all botching. Best, --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
