On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:41:45PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's one more option, that I've done with all my rigs - since RHEL4 > is definitely yesterday's: > > 3: upgrade/reinstall RHEL5/CentOS5/Fedora FC >= FC6. > > Really, RHAS4 is, of date, definitely passé. Much good stuff just > doesn't work on it any longer - or if it does, simply by botching source > to /usr/local, you name it.
While running the latest stable and supported release is just good practice, this isn't an option for everyone. It turns out that in organizations large enough for administration tasks to be divided across teams, "passé" matters far less than properly testing and certifying something in the company's own unique environment and ensuring that the tools and processes to support it are in place. To the OP: I do suggest statically linking. I'm responsible for an environment processing a significant amount of email through a dkim-filter running on RHEL <5 and statically linked against OpenSSL 0.9.8, and it works flawlessly. -- Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
