On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Daniel Black wrote: > Some reading material from the developers of mailmain and a good > discussion from Mat representing DKIM. > > http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/DKIM
There are a number of things worth mentioning about what's on this page: - the broken dkim-filter implementation that refused to sign signed messages was this one, but that was fixed in 2.3.0 (October of last year) - the recommended (by the DKIM working group at IETF) practise would, I believe, be to have either Mailman or the MTA to which Mailman hands its work re-sign the message before sending it on its way; if only there were an open-source tool to do such a thing... ;) - they do say the latter in their "Proposal" section - they talk about wishing there were some kind of DKIM validity status header, but they don't seem to reference Authentication-Results: which has been around for quite a while now - I don't understand the point about a distinction between verifiers and policy agents; in what circumstance would they not, operationally, be the same thing? > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2007-February/thread.html#19377 Awful lot to read here. I'll re-post here if I have anything that needs saying once I'm done. :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
