Tony Earnshaw skrev, on 22-01-2008 01:36: > Mark Martinec skrev, on 21-01-2008 17:18: > >>> I'm running Postfix 2.4.6 (tried 2 different 2.5 snapshots but both >>> attempts gave horrible and unacceptable side effects)
>> This is the second time you are saying that 2.5 is broken, >> whithout providing any explanation or evidence on what is broken. >> I'm running 2.5 snapshots since they exist, and have no problem >> interfacing it with dkim-milter or dk-milter, or noticing any other >> anomaly. > > Yep, probably. I'd better put the record straight, since Postfix 2.5 is now de facto standard stable, I have to adopt it whether I like or not and people on the dkim-milter list may get the wrong idea. I've never written that PF "2.5 is broken", I have written that it "gave horrible and unacceptable side effects". This is because PF 2.5 has many optional parameters that were not available with 2.4. The one in particular that made it unacceptable is prepend_delivered_header (in main.cf). The new options resulted in all messages with Delivered-To headers being bounced, whereas that did not necessarily happen with 2.4. I had 2 scenarios where this occurred, one retraining dspam and one with a maildrop vacation routine. Ok, so I read the necessary bumf and am trying things out one at a time. I shall, as I mostly do, sort out things for myself without asking help from *any* mailing list, anywhere. That latter does happen now and again, but it's very rare. > > Please be more specific (better: provide problem report >> and evidence to a postfix mailing list). Hereby. I'm cross posting to the Postfix ML to avoid confusion for posterity. > I have other things than Postfix on my mind at the moment, 2.4.6 is > running perfectly. 2.5 snapshots barf on a couple of things that make it > impossible for me to use. Hey, it works for you, why worry? > > As soon as my OpenLDAP 2.3 ppolicy stuff runs without me getting > garroted and deballed around the next corner I expect I'll get around to it. Well, the OL 2.3 (Linux/pam) ppolicy and parallel enforced Samba password policy is now working perfectly, nobody garroted me and I get to keep my balls. Mind you, it looked like being a near thing at times. --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
