On Wed, 28 May 2008, Lucas Brasilino wrote:
> Yes, it is. The first one I've just ran dkim-filter testing a mail in a
> local file (mbox file)... the second one I've ran as a daemon talking to
> postfix through a unix domain socket, and I've posted the logs of the
> receiving MTA.
Ah, I understand. In fact all you're doing is running the simulation
("-t") and live modes (without "-t") but really testing the same feature
in each case.
"no=r" is definitely broken. I'm aiming to have it fixed in a near-future
release. Unfortunately doing the fix cleanly is a little complicated so
it may not make it into 2.6.0 (which is already in Beta), but I'll try.
If your goal is to reject any mail that's not DKIM-signed, you'll need to
wait for the fix. On the other hand, if you want to reject mail that
wasn't DKIM-signed but should've been according to the sending domain's
policy, that feature is available in the current code (check out the
"ASPDiscard" configuration file item).
-MSK
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
