Hi!

> 
> Ah, I understand.  In fact all you're doing is running the simulation 
> ("-t") and live modes (without "-t") but really testing the same feature 
> in each case.

Yep :)

> "no=r" is definitely broken.  I'm aiming to have it fixed in a near-future 
> release.  Unfortunately doing the fix cleanly is a little complicated so 
> it may not make it into 2.6.0 (which is already in Beta), but I'll try.

Ok.

> If your goal is to reject any mail that's not DKIM-signed, you'll need to 
> wait for the fix.  On the other hand, if you want to reject mail that 
> wasn't DKIM-signed but should've been according to the sending domain's 
> policy, that feature is available in the current code (check out the 
> "ASPDiscard" configuration file item).

Hmmm that's type of rejection it's also great for my tests. I gonna
try it out and, if I got some doubt, I gonna bother you again :)

Thanks a lot for your help!

Lucas Brasilino

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss

Reply via email to