On Saturday September 6 2008 21:22:40 Hirohisa Yamaguchi wrote: > > Milter-dkim claims it's unsigned (although SpamAssassin detects the > > signature separately). > > No, it does not seem to be signed with DKIM.
> Maybe SpamAssassin has misinterpret X-DKIM: field (possibly a verifier > somewhere has added) as a signature itself. No, SpamAssassin doesn't care for X-DKIM. The DKIM_SIGNED rule indicates the DKIM plugin detected either a DKIM _or_ a DomainKeys signature. In this case it was a DomainKeys signature. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
