At 10:22 04-11-2008, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >Correct. Moreover, mailman (which SourceForge uses) in its current >incarnations removes DKIM signatures, so the message apparently sent by >you was unsigned, which appears to verifiers to be a violation of your >advertised signing policy.
If the DKIM signature was preserved, the verification would fail as this list adds subject tags and message footers. >I think the appropriate thing to do would be to pressure mailman not to >have "remove DKIM signatures" enabled by default. You're not the last >domain that's going to have this problem. It's a configurable option in the current version of mailman. Regards, -sm ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
