On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 05:22:10 am Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > I think the appropriate thing to do would be to pressure mailman not to > have "remove DKIM signatures" enabled by default. You're not the last > domain that's going to have this problem.
http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/DKIM DKIM isn't mentioned in their planning docs http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Mailman+2.1 http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Mailman+2.2 http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Mailman+3.0 Also being developed is the DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment and Operations Draft RFC that covers what Mailing List List Managers should do with DKIM and list email. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-02.txt > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere > in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > dkim-milter-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss -- Daniel Black -- Proudly a Gentoo Linux User. Gnu-PG/PGP signed and encrypted email preferred http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x76677097 GPG Signature D934 5397 A84A 6366 9687 9EB2 861A 4ABA 7667 7097 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
