Sven-Thorsten Fahrbach wrote: > I've checked the headers that get sent to sendmail over SMTP again, to > be sure. They really do look okay to me. Here's the hash (i.e. > associative array in non-perl parlance) with the header information as > key-value pairs: > > 'MIME-Version' => '1.0', > 'Return-Path' => '<[email protected]>', > 'X-Mailer' => 'OpenEMM V6.0.1', > 'Date' => 'Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:46:55 GMT', > 'Content-Type' => 'multipart/alternative; > boundary="-==AGNITASOUTER164240059B2900000B==" ', > 'Reply-To' => 'Company Inc. <[email protected]>', > 'Message-ID' => '<[email protected]>', > 'From' => 'Company Inc. <[email protected]>' > > Here's what the finished header looks like that gets sent over SMTP: > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Return-Path: <[email protected]> > X-Mailer: OpenEMM V6.0.1 > Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:46:55 GMT > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="-==AGNITASOUTER164240059B2900000B==" > Reply-To: Antwort Company Inc. <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > From: Company Inc. <[email protected]> > > Maybe someone will notice something out of the ordinary. > It seems the Reply-To has been changed: In the finished header there's the 'Antwort' prefix before 'Company Inc.'.
Regards, /rolf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
