> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:dkim-ops- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of McDowell, Brett > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:38 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [dkim-ops] RFC 5672 and optional vs. default value of AUID > > So, should the signature be processed as if the default value for the > AUID (i= value) were present or processed as if the AUID (i= value) > wasn't even part of the specification?
We do the former. _______________________________________________ dkim-ops mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops
