>So, should the signature be processed as if the default value for the >AUID (i= value) were present or processed as if the AUID (i= value) >wasn't even part of the specification?
>I'm asking the question because of this section related to >restricting key applicability across the namespace using t=s in the >key record has a dependency on the AUID in the signature: If there's no i= then the domain in the implicit i= is the same as the domain in the d= so t=s will always be satisfied. Or is that not the right question? R's, John _______________________________________________ dkim-ops mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops
