Original url at Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20230820174630/https://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2017-September/msg00326.html
Cc: Martin Wilck <mwi...@suse.com> Cc: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarz...@redhat.com> Cc: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varo...@opensvc.com> Cc: DM-DEVEL ML <dm-devel@lists.linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazq...@gmail.com> --- Should this code be replaced with DETECT_CHECKER_OFF in hwtable ??? --- libmultipath/propsel.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/libmultipath/propsel.c b/libmultipath/propsel.c index ad771d35..52a10765 100644 --- a/libmultipath/propsel.c +++ b/libmultipath/propsel.c @@ -642,13 +642,12 @@ out: } /* - * Current RDAC (NetApp E/EF Series) firmware relies - * on periodic REPORT TARGET PORT GROUPS for - * internal load balancing. + * Current RDAC (NetApp E/EF Series) firmware relies on periodic + * REPORT TARGET PORT GROUPS for internal load balancing. * Using the sysfs priority checker defeats this purpose. * - * Moreover, NetApp would also prefer the RDAC checker over ALUA. - * (https://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2017-September/msg00326.html) + * Moreover, NetApp would also prefer the RDAC checker over ALUA: + * (https://lore.kernel.org/dm-devel/d4d7bcd8-eb06-4b76-920d-4d5101851...@netapp.com/) */ static int check_rdac(struct path * pp) -- 2.49.0
