On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 11:12 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Original url at Wayback Machine: > https://web.archive.org/web/20230820174630/https://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2017-September/msg00326.html > > Cc: Martin Wilck <mwi...@suse.com> > Cc: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarz...@redhat.com> > Cc: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varo...@opensvc.com> > Cc: DM-DEVEL ML <dm-devel@lists.linux.dev> > Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazq...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Wilck <mwi...@suse.com> > --- > Should this code be replaced with DETECT_CHECKER_OFF in hwtable ??? No, let's just keep it as is. The check_rdac() code uses a vendor- specific VPD page to check for RDAC features, which is not the same as hard-coded values in the hwtable based on vendor and product. I'd rather not risk regressions for a minor code simplification. Regards Martin
