Sequential zones perform better for reclaim, so start off using
them and only use random zones as a fallback when cache zones are
present.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c
index 1855c056d6a4..1283405bec29 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c
@@ -281,15 +281,16 @@ static int dmz_reclaim_rnd_data(struct dmz_reclaim *zrc,
struct dm_zone *dzone)
struct dm_zone *szone = NULL;
struct dmz_metadata *zmd = zrc->metadata;
int ret;
- int alloc_flags = dmz_nr_cache_zones(zmd) ?
- DMZ_ALLOC_RND : DMZ_ALLOC_SEQ;
+ int alloc_flags = DMZ_ALLOC_SEQ;
- /* Always use sequential zones to reclaim random zones */
- if (dmz_is_rnd(dzone))
- alloc_flags = DMZ_ALLOC_SEQ;
/* Get a free random or sequential zone */
dmz_lock_map(zmd);
+again:
szone = dmz_alloc_zone(zmd, alloc_flags | DMZ_ALLOC_RECLAIM);
+ if (!szone && alloc_flags == DMZ_ALLOC_SEQ && dmz_nr_cache_zones(zmd)) {
+ alloc_flags = DMZ_ALLOC_RND;
+ goto again;
+ }
dmz_unlock_map(zmd);
if (!szone)
return -ENOSPC;
--
2.16.4
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
