From: Yu Kuai <yuku...@huawei.com>

So that io won't concurrent with array reconfiguration, and it's safe to
suspend the array directly because normal io won't rely on
md_start_sync().

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yuku...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/md/md.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index c3a51d309063..a3b62c6c5332 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -9414,8 +9414,13 @@ static void md_start_sync(struct work_struct *ws)
 {
        struct mddev *mddev = container_of(ws, struct mddev, sync_work);
        int spares = 0;
+       bool suspend = false;
 
-       mddev_lock_nointr(mddev);
+       if (md_spares_need_change(mddev))
+               suspend = true;
+
+       suspend ? mddev_suspend_and_lock_nointr(mddev) :
+                 mddev_lock_nointr(mddev);
 
        if (!md_is_rdwr(mddev)) {
                /*
@@ -9451,7 +9456,7 @@ static void md_start_sync(struct work_struct *ws)
                goto not_running;
        }
 
-       mddev_unlock(mddev);
+       suspend ? mddev_unlock_and_resume(mddev) : mddev_unlock(mddev);
        md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread);
        sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_action);
        md_new_event();
@@ -9463,7 +9468,7 @@ static void md_start_sync(struct work_struct *ws)
        clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery);
        clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &mddev->recovery);
        clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
-       mddev_unlock(mddev);
+       suspend ? mddev_unlock_and_resume(mddev) : mddev_unlock(mddev);
 
        wake_up(&resync_wait);
        if (test_and_clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER, &mddev->recovery) &&
-- 
2.39.2

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to