From: Yu Kuai <yuku...@huawei.com>

r5c_journal_mode_set() will suspend array and it has only 2 caller, the
other caller raid_ctl() already suspend the array with new apis.

This is not hot path, so performance is not concerned.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yuku...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
index 01d33e5c19c1..9909110262ee 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
@@ -2585,9 +2585,7 @@ int r5c_journal_mode_set(struct mddev *mddev, int mode)
            mode == R5C_JOURNAL_MODE_WRITE_BACK)
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       mddev_suspend(mddev);
        conf->log->r5c_journal_mode = mode;
-       mddev_resume(mddev);
 
        pr_debug("md/raid:%s: setting r5c cache mode to %d: %s\n",
                 mdname(mddev), mode, r5c_journal_mode_str[mode]);
@@ -2612,11 +2610,11 @@ static ssize_t r5c_journal_mode_store(struct mddev 
*mddev,
                if (strlen(r5c_journal_mode_str[mode]) == len &&
                    !strncmp(page, r5c_journal_mode_str[mode], len))
                        break;
-       ret = mddev_lock(mddev);
+       ret = mddev_suspend_and_lock(mddev);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
        ret = r5c_journal_mode_set(mddev, mode);
-       mddev_unlock(mddev);
+       mddev_unlock_and_resume(mddev);
        return ret ?: length;
 }
 
-- 
2.39.2

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to