On Friday, July 06, 2012 07:30:38 PM Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Friday, July 06, 2012 07:13:27 PM Jim Popovitch wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > >> > A related point is that DMARC isn't actually using SPF. It's taking an > >> > SPF > >> > record (which is meant to apply to Mail From) and applying it to From. > >> > >> I think you are referring to FPF. SPF is Sender...... > > > > That's either wrong or sarcasm I'm not getting. I'm not sure which. > > That's OK. ;-) As you begin to read on SPF, consider the comments on > Return-Path and Sender, both of which are much different from > RFC5322.From. But all of that is outside the scope of this list.
Since I'm the editor for RFC 4408bis in the IETF SPFbis working group, I'm doing rather more writing about SPF than reading these days. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
