[Catching up on what appears to have been a pretty active weekendŠ] On 7/6/12 6:19 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Thank you Michael. > >Last week DKIM was described as a solution for transactional email. Its >not ideal for situations involving end user emails. (Murray please >correct my mis statement if I got it wrong) I think that's incorrect. ADSP is a solution (of sorts) for transactional email, and not ideal for end user emails. That's not the same as pure DKIM. >When I send messages to a receiver that uses DMARC versus one that >doesn't use DMARC I want to have identical mail dispositions. I'm under >the impression that a different DNS configuration is needed, namely when >I'm sending from a domain that has end users who send to mailing lists, >alumni lists, lotus notes or exchange server DLs , Unix forwards (etc) >the final disposition may change. I think Mike specifically said that you simply have DMARC be set to the same strictness of whatever other methods you have deployed, and you get the benefits of both without them interfering with each other. -MSK > _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
