What I now know that I didn't though is that you're the only one using a linkedin.com address to subscribe to the list. Even negative information like that can have value. As I said, I don't think it's major, but it might be worth noting.
Scott K On Sunday, July 29, 2012 03:19:58 AM Franck Martin wrote: > Well, do you receive this email from me? ;) > > You have also to consider, I may be subscribed to the list with an email > address that is forwarding to another email address. In that case you may > learn, where all the emails get forwarded to. > > On 7/28/12 7:46 PM, "Steven M Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > >On 07/28/2012 17:14, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> I'm not sure if this is significant or not, but I noticed that I can > >> infer [some information about] subscribers to mailing lists based on > >> either aggregate or FBR data I get from data providers. > > > >My first reaction is that the victim of such exposure is already hosed > >based on their use of an address within in the organizational domain > >receiving the reporting. But I may just lack imagination... > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
