I imagine this is worth noting in a Privacy Considerations or Security Considerations paragraph or two, but not something that needs to be repaired in the protocol somehow.
I'll open a bug to track it for inclusion in the next version. -MSK On 7/29/12 7:48 AM, "John R Levine" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes indeed you pointed it earlier, but I forgot if it was publicly. >> >> Anyhow, nothing that a member would not get from a list. > >Most of the people on NANOG rarely post. I was surprised to find out how >many subs they have at Gmail. > >Regards, >John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY >"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly. >_______________________________________________ >dmarc-discuss mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > >NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
