What is the content of the From: header? And are you relaxed or strict? For info, in your case the SPF alignment check will not pass, because smtp.mailfrom=<> and that will not match any domain in the From: header.
For the DKIM part, I cannot tell about alignment, because I do not know the content of the From: header. So while the authentication mechanisms pass, I do not know if they are aligned... On 8/29/12 1:06 PM, "Andreas Schulze" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >from the current dmarc draft: > > A Mail Receiver MUST consider an arriving message to pass the DMARC > test if and only if one or more of the underlying message > authentication mechanisms pass with proper identifier alignment. > >Now I have this message: > >Authentication-Results: my.mta; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=<> >smtp.helo=mout.andreasschulze.de >Authentication-Results: my.mta; dkim=pass header.d=mout.andreasschulze.de >[email protected] header.b=LzLxfinS > >both authentication mechanisms pass. It's really hard to see from the >draft, why DMARC now not pass. >I also don't see, if the dmarc result should be none or fail. > >Did I miss something? >Could one recapitulate the rules for dmarc none/pass/fail ? > >Thanks >Andreas >_______________________________________________ >dmarc-discuss mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > >NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
