dkim=pass header.d=mout.andreasschulze.de
...
From: "MAILER-DAEMON"<[email protected]>
They're not merely aligned, they're identical (meaning that
strict/relaxed is irrelevant).
You have one of:
* The From: is changing between DMARC assessment and your seeing it
(unlikely for a DSN)
* A broken message that's being interpreted differently by different
components in the chain (also unlikely for a DSN)
* A DMARC implementation bug
* An integration bug (DMARC passed, but the MTA treated it as having
failed)
- Roland
On 08/30/2012 04:43 AM, Andreas Schulze wrote:
Am Mi, 29.08.2012, 22:31 schrieb Franck Martin:
What is the content of the From: header? And are you relaxed or strict?
From: "MAILER-DAEMON" <[email protected]>
I suppose relaxed mode:
# dig _dmarc.mout.andreasschulze.de. txt +short
"v=DMARC1\; p=reject"
But I just learned, that dmarc could never pass for a domain only sending
delivery status notifications because RFC5321.From is empty.
So I will change the Record to "v=DMARC1; p=none"
Andreas
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
--
Roland Turner | Director, Labs
TrustSphere Pte Ltd | 3 Phillip Street #13-03, Singapore 048693
Mobile: +65 96700022 | Skype: roland.turner
[email protected] | http://www.trustsphere.com/
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
