Yes, 163.com/126.com, as well as yeah.net who are all domains of NetEase, sends failure report as purpose to warn the domain owner when "EITHER" dkim "OR" spf fails to be aligned with the From: domain. And the final disposition of those emails will be listed in the daily aggregate reports.
Although failure reports can be very meaningful and very useful during in monitor mode, since there's no normative guide for this in the current spec, receivers can do differently according to their own strategy, even never send failure reports. -Junping At 2012-11-15 16:49:45,"Tom Hendrikx" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 11/15/12 6:20 AM, John Levine wrote: >>> I'm new to DMARC, with very, very tiny email needs. I was in monitor >>> mode for a few weeks, with forwarders being my only problem. Last >>> last week I turned on Quarantine policy. >> >> If your domain has live users who send mail to mailing lists, use >> newspaper web site mail and article to a friend, and all the other >> entirely reasonable stuff that users do, that is a very poor idea, >> unless you want people to throw away your users' mail. >> >> You need to fix your dmarc record to say p=none, and do not change the >> p= to anything else, ever. >> >> Domains with live users can use dmarc to collect all sorts of >> interesting statistics (see my scripts), but dmarc simply cannot >> describe all the ways that individual users send mail. That's not >> what it's for. >> > >I was investigating a similar issue: while being in monitor mode the >only failure reports I received came from sf.net mailing list traffic >forwarded to 126.com/163.com. >However, their aggregate reports list the same messages as delivered >because of a policy override regarding mailinglists that is in place, >and my contact with their abuse department confimed that. > >Since I am not receiving any similar failure reports from any of the >other parties that do send aggregates, I was investigating if it was >correct to send failure reports for messages that are in fact covered by >a policy override. I learnt today that google simply never sends failure >reports, but I'm not sure about aol, yahoo, etc yet. > >I spent some time digging through the spec, but I didn't find any >guidelines on this. Any insights? > >-- >Tom >_______________________________________________ >dmarc-discuss mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > >NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms >(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
