What does disposition mean in this case? It also raises the question, why did Gmail put the email in spam instead of rejecting it as the dmarc policy specifes? I can think of 2 reasonable things: 1: Google is still not confident senders are implementing dmarc correctly and as a precaution quarantining messages (instead of rejecting them) 2: Gmail is smart enough to take into account the presence of the List-Id header and/or other headers and applying special case processing for mailing lists.
Any thoughts? On 4 Apr 2013 11:12, "Murray Kucherawy" <[email protected]> wrote: > I would guess it means "disposition", but since it's in a comment, it's > probably not supposed to mean anything to parsers. > > From: Andy Wilson <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:59:22 +1300 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header > > Has anyone else noticed Google are now inserting a dmarc result into > their AR? > I just noticed this from an email Benny sent (which ended up in spam due > to p=reject) > > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://mx.google.com&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=aZ0xRzXh0AB20HBCmRph%2Bg%3D%3D%0A&m=wCj72IWTuytJYJCR9EhcBAz4D83F0Y%2Fb55%2F9T6NNGAM%3D%0A&s=8dd0d171b958943cb70fd63d18f4faf8d22259ab714acdb53ba3bd7f59a092c3>; > spf=pass (google.com > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://google.com&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=aZ0xRzXh0AB20HBCmRph%2Bg%3D%3D%0A&m=wCj72IWTuytJYJCR9EhcBAz4D83F0Y%2Fb55%2F9T6NNGAM%3D%0A&s=e6367b0e8944e8e790e4205b6be8c3f708102eb399ec260365651146b090b106>: > domain of [email protected] designates 208.69.40.157 as > permitted sender) [email protected]; > dkim=pass [email protected] > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://dmarc.org&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=aZ0xRzXh0AB20HBCmRph%2Bg%3D%3D%0A&m=wCj72IWTuytJYJCR9EhcBAz4D83F0Y%2Fb55%2F9T6NNGAM%3D%0A&s=1e51581d056ea1196431d5698d0d7ff17a30eec738c8204246e240bfb126a7a7>; > dmarc=fail (p=REJECT dis=none) d=junc.eu > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://junc.eu&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=aZ0xRzXh0AB20HBCmRph%2Bg%3D%3D%0A&m=wCj72IWTuytJYJCR9EhcBAz4D83F0Y%2Fb55%2F9T6NNGAM%3D%0A&s=82a111529a2ef46ace452d4c6aa0626cafb0c87ae011b125fb67383d080a4747> > > > Can anyone from Google comment on the use of this header, not quite sure > what dis=none means > > -- > Regards > > Andy > _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating > in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms ( > http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
