Hi All, Yes Gmail started adding dmarc information to Authentication-Results header. It is amazing that you noticed the change just a couple of days after the launch! This is our first experiment and I am pretty sure the format of the data will evolve in the future. We are open for suggestions. Let me explain the new record:
dmarc=fail (p=REJECT dis=none) d=junc.eu dmarc=fail -- DMARC authentication failed. d=junc.eu -- we applied dmarc policy for junc.eu domain p=REJECT -- junc.eu published 'reject' policy dis=none (disposition=none) -- means that Gmail applied "none" policy instead of "reject". Most probably this happened because the message was forwarded. Finally the message ended-up in the spam folder based on some other conditions, not related to DMARC. Please let me know if you have questions. Thank you, Olga On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Andy Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Has anyone else noticed Google are now inserting a dmarc result into their AR? > I just noticed this from an email Benny sent (which ended up in spam due to p=reject) > > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; > spf=pass (google.com: domain of > [email protected] 208.69.40.157 as permitted > sender) smtp.mail= [email protected]; > dkim=pass [email protected]; > dmarc=fail (p=REJECT dis=none) d=junc.eu > > > Can anyone from Google comment on the use of this header, not quite sure what dis=none means > > -- > Regards > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
