On Apr 27, 2013, at 12:18 PM, John Sweet <[email protected]> wrote: > Presumably it also means that Google won't generate and send them to > your non-Google-hosted domain either (I can't think of how you would > do one and not the other). I could just publish a ruf= record, and > see for myself, I suppose.
Hi John, Google doesn't generate the ruf= type reports. Why? Only Google can say, but my imaginative conjecture is that major providers don't want to handle the support load *and*, because DMARC is relatively new, they don't want to be trailblazers in the "hey, here's a new way to get access to potentially sensitive data" arena. HTH, =- Tim > I'm mostly just curious as to why. Are they concerned they'll be > abused for backscatter spam, the way NDR reports were a few years ago? > That doesn't seem likely. > > Anyone know? Alternatively, we could amuse each other with imaginative > conjectures. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
