On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Franck Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:09 AM, John Sweet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What I find puzzling about the Google Apps DMARC page is that it seems >> to actively discourage use of the ruf= tag under any circumstances. I >> suppose it's easier to say, "we don't support it," than, "using this >> can have all kinds of unpleasant consequences, so use only with >> extreme caution, and only after you fully understand what they are." >> > Well the DMARC FAQ also recommend to not put a ruf= in your record until you > know what you are doing. Especially until you have an estimate of how many > failure reports you may get. I'll champion the cause of the ignorant. Just turn on ruf and "see" what comes in. It's a very effective way of figuring out what you are doing, and what effect your DMARC policy made. If you don't find the data useful, turn it off and route the reports to /dev/null. On that note, if one thought it possible that they'd get a very large quantity of reports, a compelling argument could be made for publishing separate email addresses for rua and ruf reports. :-) Matt _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
