A number of posts have listed salient reasons for not supporting real time
reports. Suffice it to say that Google finds these reasons compelling and
we don't have any plans to offer real time reports. We're happy that some
providers do provide them as a part of their DMARC implementation because
they do address some legitimate use cases. But we made this decision before
the launch of DMARC and we haven't seen any information since then that has
compelled us to change our mind.

thanks,
AD


On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Steve Atkins <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Franck Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:34 PM, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>>> For the institutional domains that are DMARC's main target, there's no
> >>>> problem since there's no mail from individual users, but for domains
> >>>> with people, and particularly domains where the people are not
> >>>> employees of the domain operator, the privacy issues are worrying.
> >>>>
> >>> p=none is used on all kind of domains.
> >>>
> >>> Per the spec, the sending of a failure report is not tied to any p=,
> only that the email fails dmarc.
> >>
> >> Quite right.  For anyone with live users in their mail domains, ruf=
> provides the system admin ability to snoop on mail that he should never
> have seen.
> >>
> > I think this statement is overreaching, you have not yet demonstrated
> that the system admin would have access to emails he would not been able to
> obtain via other means.
>
> If I send mail from my ISPs smarthost, using my corporate email address,
> to a deliverable recipient, how would my corporate postmaster have access
> to that email?
>
> Cheers,
>   Steve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to