Hi, Yes Google does not generate forensic reports because of privacy concerns. The problem with forensic reports is that it allows to identify sender-recipient pairs, and other details, which are considered private. We discussed the topic with our legal team and the answer is definite "no". Olga
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Adam Dawes <[email protected]> wrote: > A number of posts have listed salient reasons for not supporting real time > reports. Suffice it to say that Google finds these reasons compelling and > we don't have any plans to offer real time reports. We're happy that some > providers do provide them as a part of their DMARC implementation because > they do address some legitimate use cases. But we made this decision before > the launch of DMARC and we haven't seen any information since then that has > compelled us to change our mind. > > thanks, > AD > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Steve Atkins <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Franck Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:34 PM, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>>> For the institutional domains that are DMARC's main target, there's >> no >> >>>> problem since there's no mail from individual users, but for domains >> >>>> with people, and particularly domains where the people are not >> >>>> employees of the domain operator, the privacy issues are worrying. >> >>>> >> >>> p=none is used on all kind of domains. >> >>> >> >>> Per the spec, the sending of a failure report is not tied to any p=, >> only that the email fails dmarc. >> >> >> >> Quite right. For anyone with live users in their mail domains, ruf= >> provides the system admin ability to snoop on mail that he should never >> have seen. >> >> >> > I think this statement is overreaching, you have not yet demonstrated >> that the system admin would have access to emails he would not been able to >> obtain via other means. >> >> If I send mail from my ISPs smarthost, using my corporate email address, >> to a deliverable recipient, how would my corporate postmaster have access >> to that email? >> >> Cheers, >> Steve >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >> > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
