Are you intending to inform all implementers and domain owners of this limitation with admonitions to search the list archives?
I am expecting it to be in the RFC, yes.
It's still a work in progress, and it's not intended to be implemented by people who don't have a reasonably good technical understanding of email systems and the issues of spam filtering.
Some people will inevitably want every new anti-spam twiddle to be the FUSSP, no matter how many times we say it's not. SPF wasn't, DKIM (and particularly ADSP) wasn't, and DMARC isn't and won't be. This should not be a surprise.
R's, John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
